On September 20th, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States dismissed, at the parties’ joint request, an ERISA lawsuit (Pioneer Centres Hold. v. Alerus Fin.) that could have potentially resolved an existing circuit split over who bears the burden of proof in ERISA breach of fiduciary duty claims. The case was dismissed because the underlying dispute was settled by the parties.
For now, this circuit split will remain in place. In this article, our Philadelphia ERISA litigation lawyer provides a brief overview of where different circuit courts currently stand in regards to the burden of proof in breach of fiduciary duty actions brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
In several circuit courts — the Sixth, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh — judges have held that beneficiaries and not fiduciaries bear the burden of proving causation when they bring an ERISA-based breach of fiduciary duty lawsuit. More specifically, it is on the plaintiff to prove that there is a causal link between the fiduciary’s alleged misconduct and the actual financial losses sustained by the beneficiaries of the ERISA plan.
In other circuit courts — Second, Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth — judges have ruled that the burden shifts to the fiduciary as soon as the plaintiff (the beneficiary) is able to establish a prima facie case of breach of fiduciary duty. A prima facie case is one that relies on basic evidence that is sufficient to prove something and that can be accepted until it is refuted. With this legal standard, the hurdles that beneficiaries must clear in ERISA breach of fiduciary duty claims are far lower.
The circuit split may be resolved at some point in the future. Indeed, most significant circuit splits are eventually resolved: The Supreme Court often grants certiorari in cases that can help to resolve circuit splits and bring uniformity to federal courts across the country. However, until the nation’s highest court actually decides to do so, the circuit split on the ERISA breach of fiduciary question is likely to remain in place.
At The Garner Firm, we represent executives, workers, and other plan participants in all aspects of ERISA litigation. Our Philadelphia ERISA lawyers has extensive experience handling complex breach of fiduciary duty claims. To find out more about what we can do for you, please do not hesitate to contact our legal team at (215) 645-5955 to schedule a free, fully confidential consultation.
Adam and his team are great. They did an excellent job helping my family when we were really losing hope. Adam is very professional and has excellent knowledge to protect your rights. If you choose Adam you will talk directly with him. It was a truly pleasant experience. I’m extremely thankful that I chose the Garner firm. I highly recommend them.
Adam Garner provided excellent courteous and considerate service in helping me resolve a long term disability claim. He was accessible, knowledgeable and exercised the good judgement necessary for us to be successful. I heartily recommend his expertise and services
This review is long over-due!
If you’re looking for professional and sound legal advice, The Garner Firm is where you want to start!
Throughout my relationship with The Garner Firm, there was never a time that I felt uninformed where my case stood. Attorney Adam Garner focuses on making sure his clients are well informed throughout their legal battle. I can reassure any prospective clients that Adam will maximize all his resources and fight to the MAX in order you’re reasonably compensated.
I invite you to take the opportunity to contact The Garner Firm – YOU WILL NOT REGRET IT!
Adam is extremely knowledgeable and always helped answer all of our questions we had. Very supportive in a challenging case. He understood our situation and was beyond great! He helped my family so much!
I would highly recommend Adam and the Garner Firm!
How did we do?
Note: Your review may be shared publicly.