On September 20th, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States dismissed, at the parties’ joint request, an ERISA lawsuit (Pioneer Centres Hold. v. Alerus Fin.) that could have potentially resolved an existing circuit split over who bears the burden of proof in ERISA breach of fiduciary duty claims. The case was dismissed because the underlying dispute was settled by the parties.
For now, this circuit split will remain in place. In this article, our Philadelphia ERISA litigation lawyer provides a brief overview of where different circuit courts currently stand in regards to the burden of proof in breach of fiduciary duty actions brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
In several circuit courts — the Sixth, Ninth, Tenth, and Eleventh — judges have held that beneficiaries and not fiduciaries bear the burden of proving causation when they bring an ERISA-based breach of fiduciary duty lawsuit. More specifically, it is on the plaintiff to prove that there is a causal link between the fiduciary’s alleged misconduct and the actual financial losses sustained by the beneficiaries of the ERISA plan.
In other circuit courts — Second, Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth — judges have ruled that the burden shifts to the fiduciary as soon as the plaintiff (the beneficiary) is able to establish a prima facie case of breach of fiduciary duty. A prima facie case is one that relies on basic evidence that is sufficient to prove something and that can be accepted until it is refuted. With this legal standard, the hurdles that beneficiaries must clear in ERISA breach of fiduciary duty claims are far lower.
The circuit split may be resolved at some point in the future. Indeed, most significant circuit splits are eventually resolved: The Supreme Court often grants certiorari in cases that can help to resolve circuit splits and bring uniformity to federal courts across the country. However, until the nation’s highest court actually decides to do so, the circuit split on the ERISA breach of fiduciary question is likely to remain in place.
At The Garner Firm, we represent executives, workers, and other plan participants in all aspects of ERISA litigation. Our Philadelphia ERISA lawyer has extensive experience handling complex breach of fiduciary duty claims. To find out more about what we can do for you, please do not hesitate to contact our legal team at (215) 645-5955 to schedule a free, fully confidential consultation.
Adam is extremely knowledgeable and always helped answer all of our questions we had. Very supportive in a challenging case. He understood our situation and was beyond great! He helped my family so much!
I would highly recommend Adam and the Garner Firm!
I would highly recommend Adam to anyone!!! He is very professional, works hard for you, and very knowledgeable. He is honest and upfront with you with any obstacles that he may face in representing you. He keeps you well informed of your case and responds promptly to any questions or concerns you may have. He does a Stellar job!!!
From the initial phone call for assistance to the end of the case Adam and The Garner Firm was an absolute blessing to me and my family. He presented genuine concern and professionalism throughout the process. Where as other attorneys see’s a client as a client Adam fights for a client like were and individual who’s rights have been violated. I’m very grateful for his help through a very rough time and trust that this review is sincere. Blessing to the Adam and The Garner Firm.
Adam Garner is the definition of professionalism and expertise. He is currently handling my case, which turned out to be more difficult than expected, and is getting positive results. I would highly recommend Mr. Garner to anyone with a disability and/or workplace issue.
How did we do?
Note: Your review may be shared publicly.